Comments on: social media body of knowledge http://www.jonathannguyen.net/social-media/social-media-body-of-knowledge/ A discourse on intercourse Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:51:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: commaim http://www.jonathannguyen.net/social-media/social-media-body-of-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-246 commaim Mon, 25 May 2009 04:39:47 +0000 http://www.jonathannguyen.net/?p=82#comment-246 sounds intelligent to me. bring it on. sounds intelligent to me. bring it on.

]]> By: commaim http://www.jonathannguyen.net/social-media/social-media-body-of-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-169 commaim Sun, 24 May 2009 23:39:47 +0000 http://www.jonathannguyen.net/?p=82#comment-169 sounds intelligent to me. bring it on. sounds intelligent to me. bring it on.

]]> By: jnau http://www.jonathannguyen.net/social-media/social-media-body-of-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-8 jnau Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:57:31 +0000 http://www.jonathannguyen.net/?p=82#comment-8 You were quick with that response!<br>I've had some thinking music based on what your thoughts and I think you are right and on two fronts:<br><br>First<br>There is no authoritative source at the moment because no one actually knows! We're still working stuff out and there is no empirical evidence.<br><br>Second<br>Social media like traditional media is more art than science, so what works for one person may not work for another.<br><br>The question is though how do we establish experts in this early stage. Does expert mean that you have conducted PhD research or does it mean that we adopt a more open source software stance and submit for peer review and consensus?<br><br>I suspect it might be the latter. You were quick with that response!
I've had some thinking music based on what your thoughts and I think you are right and on two fronts:

First
There is no authoritative source at the moment because no one actually knows! We're still working stuff out and there is no empirical evidence.

Second
Social media like traditional media is more art than science, so what works for one person may not work for another.

The question is though how do we establish experts in this early stage. Does expert mean that you have conducted PhD research or does it mean that we adopt a more open source software stance and submit for peer review and consensus?

I suspect it might be the latter.

]]> By: Matthew Hodgson http://www.jonathannguyen.net/social-media/social-media-body-of-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Matthew Hodgson Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:31:41 +0000 http://www.jonathannguyen.net/?p=82#comment-7 Many disciplines have a BOK, including PMs and BAs, but these knowledge repositories have reverted to more traditional ideas of knowledge, that is approved, edited, and peer reviewed, and expert sanctioned knowledge in much the same form as Britanica.<br><br>If we have a BOK , better to call it a wiki, have profiles for expert contributors, etc, so that this can become knowledge for practitioners, by practitioners, without boundaries as, unlike the discipline of PM, we should never assume that, as web practitioners, we know all there is to know about the web. <br><br>M Many disciplines have a BOK, including PMs and BAs, but these knowledge repositories have reverted to more traditional ideas of knowledge, that is approved, edited, and peer reviewed, and expert sanctioned knowledge in much the same form as Britanica.

If we have a BOK , better to call it a wiki, have profiles for expert contributors, etc, so that this can become knowledge for practitioners, by practitioners, without boundaries as, unlike the discipline of PM, we should never assume that, as web practitioners, we know all there is to know about the web.

M

]]>